Skip to main content

Capital Planning & Compliance Reporting

A Five-Year Plan That Survives The Budget Hearing

Capital plans fail in public for one of two reasons: the ranking can’t be explained, or the condition data behind it is stale. We build the plan from current condition, rank it with a model whose weights are printed in the document, and show what the portfolio’s condition looks like with the plan funded and without it.

What The Engagement Covers

Capital Improvement Plan development
Five-year project schedule, by asset, by year, by funding source.

Capital sequencing
What goes first and why, with the ranking model disclosed rather than asserted.

Funding strategy
Matching projects to funding sources and identifying what’s unfunded at each horizon.

GASB reporting support
A Capital Asset Activity Schedule your auditor can work from.

FCA reporting
Condition and deferred maintenance in the format that goes to a board or a council.

The Ranking Model Is Printed In The Plan

Every capital plan ranks projects. Most don’t say how. Ours prints the scoring model — urgency, return, effect on asset value, and tenant or occupant risk, each with its weight — and shows the score each project received on each factor.

This is not a technical nicety. When a council member asks why the roof at one facility outranks the HVAC at another, the answer is in the document rather than in the room.

On GASB, we state the boundary rather than blur it. We produce a Capital Asset Activity Schedule — additions, disposals, the rollforward, a debt schedule, and a stated basis of presentation. That is audit support: the working document your finance team and your auditor build the note disclosure from. We do not produce the audited note disclosure itself, because historical cost, useful life, salvage, and accumulated depreciation live in your financial system, not in a condition assessment.

Scroll to follow the lineage →

AppraisalRent rollOperating statementCondition reportClosing statementAsset valueIncome & expenseBuilding systemsDebt termsNOIFCIDSCRCapital planFCA reportGASB schedule

The lineage behind the plan and the schedule — condition and income resolving into the FCI and NOI that rank projects and populate the rollforward.

Five-Year Capital Plan

Annual CapEx

$188K

Reserve Balance

$215K

Avg ROI

15.5%

Quarterly Forecast

Q1 2026
$73K
Q2 2026
$62K
Q3 2026
$35K
Q4 2026
$18K

Priority Projects

HVAC Replacement

305 Market

high$45K18%

Roof Repair

88 Pine Ave

high$28K12%

Unit Renovation

142 Oak St

medium$62K24%

Parking Lot

17 Harbor Ln

low$35K8%
Projects ranked by a weighted model printed in the deliverable — urgency, return, effect on asset value, and occupant risk. Portfoliq’s own interface, on demonstration data.

What You Get

Five-year Capital Improvement Plan
Project schedule, category matrix, funding sources, and condition evidence, ranked with disclosed weights.

Capital Asset Activity Schedule
Rollforward, activity detail, debt schedule, basis of presentation. Audit support.

Facility condition report
Condition, deferred maintenance, and FCI by asset and portfolio-wide.

The planning system
Re-run the plan next year against updated condition data.

Where This Comes Up

CIP development is a recurring, budgeted category for counties, municipalities, and campuses, and it travels bundled — impact fee studies and land use assumptions frequently sit in the same solicitation.

Tell Us What You Own

Most engagements start with a portfolio list and a deadline. That’s enough to have a useful conversation.

Contact Us